Third night off with food poisoning - unpaid 
A certain takeaway has been reported to Powys Environmental Health :realmad:
Could be, but she’s been lying to us for the last couple of years frequently but the last couple of weeks she seems to be making it her mission to see how many lies she can tell in one day to her teacher & us :rolleyes:
Attention-seeking? LOL listen at Mr Experienced Parent himself, tell ya what I’ll butt out and leave you to it, you KNOW what you are doing and I’m guessing. Not exactly helpful :boggle:
Oh she’s deffo attention seeking but she usually resorts to tantrums for that 
As for knowing what I’m doing…nah, I just play it by ear :lol:
Finding that Blondie are playing the O2 arena on 30th June, and its almost impossible for me to get there.
Spending £95 on high school uniform for the oldest :eek: Wouldn’t be so bad but that doesn’t include school trousers, school shoes, tracksuit (for PE), trainers (again for PE), football boots, new bag (he needs it, he’s had his other one 4 years and it’s very much past it’s best) and of course all the other bumph he’ll need for high school such as notebooks etc.
Basically that £95 is made up of 3 x polo shirts, 2 x school jumpers, 1 x PE polo shirt, 1 x rugby shirt, 1 x pair football socks, 1 x craft apron & 1 x gum shield :rolleyes:
when they get older to that stage, first time in new school we brought one of each from the school, then went off to Tesco, Adsa, M&S and everywhere else that has school uniform sales at that time of year.
Saved a fortune 
DT.
Thing is, they’ve got to have the school logo on their polo shirts, jumpers & PE polo at his high school Malk
Girlie friends at work falling out with each other and beings right B!tchs and two faced with each other.
And using Facebook as a means of bullying feel like banging there heads together multiple times :catfight: been royally daft over past few months.
they said exactly the same at Michaels, the school said one thing, the teachers said another - close enough will do. They wanted £60 for his blazer 
With his current growth rate that was going to get expensive. He now wears one I think it was from M&S.
Stand outside the school at one kickout time and see how many you can spot with non-standard uniforms 
It’s most frustrating when the schools all say one thing in the leaflets, money making scammers the lot of them. Having had Bec sit as a school governer at a school that did the same you get to see what really goes on, Mr/Mrs Treasurer rubs hand in glee when a new term starts :mad:
:soapbox:
DT.
Thankfully they don’t do blazers at his school, but yes they do all have to wear the uniform. They’re not allowed to wear hooded tops at all, even as a jacket and if they have the school fleece (not a neccesity) then it must be worn as a jacket, it’s not allowed to be worn as a jumper.
Reading today that the Yorkshire Ripper’s prison sentence is to be looked at and that some numpties are of the opinion he’s a changed character and should in the future be considered for parole?
Seem to remember another ‘changed character’ that was released and re-offended by committing another murder within hours of being released… Nice to know the f***ing system is still deemed to be working and that ‘changed characters’ are still considered to pose no threat to the public.
He will leave prison in a box NEVER TO WALK OUR STREETS AGAIN, there is some justice around Lonely
Amongst other things, there were 2 for £2.50 on Lindt bars at Sainsburys. Got home, can only find one of them yet both appears on receipt… argh!
Possibility that my wound might be infected :sigh:
[QUOTE=Lonely;454852]Reading today that the Yorkshire Ripper’s prison sentence is to be looked at and that some numpties are of the opinion he’s a changed character and should in the future be considered for parole?
Seem to remember another ‘changed character’ that was released and re-offended by committing another murder within hours of being released… Nice to know the f***ing system is still deemed to be working and that ‘changed characters’ are still considered to pose no threat to the public.[/QUOTE]
As Sheffy says, the official decision is that Sutcliffe technically never going to be released.
Why technically? It’s in the small print. Sutcliffe was convicted in 1981.
He was transferred to Broadmoor Psychiatric Hospital in 1984, diagnosed as schizophrenic.
Some numpty decided his schizophrenia has improved (he refused treatment until ‘forced to’ in 1993, 9 years later). He’s now 63 and partially blind after being stabbed in the eyes by another Broadmoor inmate.
He’s actually going to be moved to a minimum security mental health unit in Wakefield. In practice, he’s been out and about for years to shop and visit his fathers grave. His supervised ‘day release’ will continue and will probably increase.
Sorry to be the bearer of bad news. That’s the ‘potted’ version.
Reason I know is that I’m part of the support ‘network’ for one of the kids of a victim.
[QUOTE=Lonely;454852]Reading today that the Yorkshire Ripper’s prison sentence is to be looked at and that some numpties are of the opinion he’s a changed character and should in the future be considered for parole?
Seem to remember another ‘changed character’ that was released and re-offended by committing another murder within hours of being released… Nice to know the f***ing system is still deemed to be working and that ‘changed characters’ are still considered to pose no threat to the public.[/QUOTE]
As Sheffy says, the official decision is that Sutcliffe technically never going to be released.
Why technically? It’s in the small print. Sutcliffe was convicted in 1981.
He was transferred to Broadmoor Psychiatric Hospital in 1984, diagnosed as schizophrenic.
Some numpty decided his schizophrenia has improved (he refused treatment until ‘forced to’ in 1993, 9 years later). He’s now 63 and partially blind after being stabbed in the eyes by another Broadmoor inmate.
He’s actually going to be moved to a minimum security mental health unit in Wakefield. In practice, he’s been out and about for years to shop and visit his fathers grave. His supervised ‘day release’ will continue and will probably increase.
Sorry to be the bearer of bad news. That’s the ‘potted’ version.
Reason I know is that I’m part of the support ‘network’ for one of the kids of a victims.
Toothache/earache…not sure where the pain’s coming from but it’s affecting both my mouth & ear
Sodding Architects annoyed me today.
My garden has shrunk by 900mm or he doesnt know how a tape measure works.
I have builders standing around and a real danger of exhausting local supplies of PG-Tips.
Now if he would just answer his phone…
:furious:
I was aware of most of what you posted but what really got up my nose was the fact that the numpties involved could actually consider him for release knowing the fact that he had to be forced into taking meds. Once outside he would more than likely just bin the meds and, of course, once the new deed(s) done, it’s way too late for the victim(s). Perhaps if ‘they’ were to be held responsible for his actions outside, they might not be so inclined to even think of releasing the rippers of this world. Totally different ballgame when on supervised day release than when on 24/7 release. Then we have to take into account the name change which doesn’t help should things go pear-shaped.